Sun Microsystems, Cisco, Novell, Red Hat, VMware, Juniper and a host of smaller companies have signed the Open Cloud Manifesto, but Google, Microsoft, Amazon and Salesforce.com -- companies whose cloud computing efforts are much more than just strategies at this point -- have declined.
As some industry watchers have pointed out, the Open Cloud Manifesto's view of how the cloud computing industry needs to evolve appears to be heavily skewed against Microsoft, which raises the possibility that this is little more than a way for IBM to kick some sand in Microsoft's face.
For example, the Open Cloud Manifesto includes statements such as, "Cloud providers must not use their market position to lock customers into their particular platforms and limit their choice of providers," and, "We must ensure that standards promote innovation and do not inhibit it." It's not such a great leap to say that Microsoft is being targeted here.
Microsoft last week criticized the Open Cloud Manifesto organizers for attempting to strong-arm the company into signing at the last minute, which Microsoft declined to do. "An open manifesto emerging from a closed process is at least mildly ironic," Steven Martin, senior director of development platform management at Microsoft, said in a blog post last week.
Cloud computing is still very much in its infancy, and so any customer that signs up today is by definition a bleeding-edge adopter who understands the risks of being locked into a particular vendor's technology, says Ken Winell, CEO of ExpertCollab, a SharePoint-focused solution provider in Florham Park, N.J.
"I think the platforms, along with some of the convergence initiatives from Cisco and HP, will change the cloud structures, and so it is probably premature to lock in something," Winell said. "And with the current economic turmoil, unless a business deal is very lucrative, most customers are going to be gun-shy to spend unless true savings and stability are realized."
Daniel Duffy, CEO of Valley Network Solutions, a Microsoft Gold partner in Fresno, Calif., doesn't see much of a need for a manifesto that spells out how to ensure interoperability in cloud computing.
"It's all based on open standards anyway, and every vendor puts their own unique spin on the delivery mechanisms, interfaces and functionality," Duffy said. "Interoperability is a necessity in our business though, and open, transparent systems are the key to making that possible."
- Juniper Honors 12 Americas Partners
- Facebook And Four More Web Sites We Love To Hate
- Cisco Honors Top Partners During 2010 Partner Summit
- HP Salutes Top Partners At APC 2010 Award Show
- Upclose And Personal With AMD And friends
- Will Oracle's Phillips' Affair Revelation Be A Distraction?
- Apple, Microsoft Unlikely Allies Against Google
- HP-Microsoft Cloud Partnership Needs To Show Us The Goods
- Blog: It's Time For A Cybercrime Public Service Announcement
- Nortel Sell-Off Continues: Ethernet Business To Ciena?
- Want To Deploy Exchange 2007 SP2 In A Server 2008 R2 Domain? Sorry
- Apple Improves iTunes 9 With Syncing, Visual Enhancements
- Oracle Ad Refutes Sun Hardware Fears
- U.S. Copyright Chief Rips Google Book Deal In Testimony
- Apple Slashes iPod Price Tags
- Price Is Right? Asus To Launch Low-Cost E-Reader
- Microsoft Xbox 360 Consoles Fail More Often Than Wii, PS3
- Privacy Group To Congress: Stop Online Advertisers In Their Tracks
- Microsoft, Intel Tout Their Collaboration On Windows 7
- Tech Data Adds Integration Services With New Center
| • |
| • |
| • |
| • |
| • |
| • |
| • |
|
|
