We’ve always liked Geekbench because it does as good as job as you’ll see in comparing computing devices on an apples-to-apples basis regardless of whether they run Linux, Windows XP, Vista or 7, or Mac OS X. The trouble for iPhone fans is that, until now, there has been no benchmarking software that could provide us with a relevant comparison between the iPad and legacy computing devices.
Well, folks, for the low, low price of $1.99 from the Apple iTunes App Store, you can now download Geekbench 2.1.9 for iPhone OS and see for yourself how Apple’s wonder products stack up head-to-head with PCs. (At least on a system performance basis.)
The app measures integer performance, floating point, memory and stream.
We downloaded Primate Labs’ app, and ran it on both an iPad and iPhone 4. The results:
The 32GB iPad, running iPhone 3.2, chalked up a score of 436. The iPhone 4, running iPhone 4.0.1, scored a 362.
For the iPad, that puts it at about 25 percent of the performance for a similarly priced notebook PC, and about 20-25 percent for the iPhone.
So on a simple, hardware-focused performance measurement, that’s not great. But like most benchmarking techniques, the numbers only tell part of the story. For example, iPad gets 12 hours of battery life out of the box. But it can’t multitask. But it’s feather-light and a breeze to carry around and actually use.
The 436 Geekbench score means that the iPad provides about one-tenth the compute power (as measured by Primate Labs’ software) of today’s notebook PCs and even less performance than a lot of netbooks. But Apple crams an awful lot of “wow” into that 436 score.
The bottom line: Apple hasn’t designed iPhones or iPads to be performance devices and that was clear even without benchmarking software. Geekbench just confirms that. But those devices perform in “intangible” ways - - ways you can’t benchmark with a mathematical equation. Fortunately, there is another time-tested benchmark for how strong the iPad performs: sales. Apple had sold 3.27 million iPads through the end of June.
So there are benchmarks, it seems, and there are benchmarks.
- How Windows 8 Beta Could Underwhelm Us
- Three New Features For Business We Want In iPad 3
- How Meg Whitman Can Save WebOS
- 'Extra-PC Era' Describes It Better
- LibreOffice’s Bold Course for the Tablet
- Leaving Your iPhone In The Back Of A Cab
- Analysis: Ubuntu's 'Open for Business' Sign To Developers
- Firefox Memory Leaks Once Again Causing Frustrations
- Microsoft’s Windows 8 To Do List Short, But Serious
- The Door Cracks Open for the BlackBerry PlayBook
- Today’s Daily App: Maven Web Browser for iPad
- Will Ubuntu Again Benefit From Industry Turmoil?
- Samsung Takes Swipe At Google With Its Windows 7 Slate
- Intel Inside Android, via McAfee Security
- Why Michael Dell Is Right About PCs, And HP Could Be Wrong
- Why 2011 Is The Year Of Open Source
- What If They Had A Tablet Price War And Nobody Came?
- Why Google Needs to Get a Grip on Security
- Google Puts the Blocks Up With Personal Blocklist
- Is Salesforce.com’s Chatter Just More Noise?
| • |
| • |
| • |
| • |
| • |
| • |
| • |
|
|
