
Most everyone loves Thanksgiving turkeys. But IT industry turkeys? Not so much. We look at 10 examples of 'turkeys' that have disappointed the tech industry this year.
Mark Thompson, global director of sales and marketing at HP ProCurve, said the vendor is gaining in notoriety. "The world is beginning to know of ProCurve. More and more people are becoming aware that there is a choice," Thompson said.
ProCurve's growth in the first quarter spread across regions and across product lines, including its Layer 3, Gigabit Ethernet and Power-over-Ethernet products, Thompson said. "Layer 2 also grew. We refreshed our product line, and we're doing a lot better job of doing channel marketing," he said. "It's a combination of a good channel program and the good work the channel is doing."
One of the most appealing elements of ProCurve's strategy is the lifetime warranty it offers. That, combined with lower-cost products, proves to be attractive to budget-conscious customers that aren't afraid to stray from the market leader.
One wrinkle in ProCurve's ascension so far is the June departure of John McHugh, vice president and worldwide general manager of HP's ProCurve division, who has since been replaced with Marius Haas, former HP senior vice president of strategy and corporate development. McHugh is widely credited with building ProCurve up from scratch, and his departure surprised many HP solution providers.
"Losing a guy like that can be a setback," said John Barker, president of Versatile Communications, a Marlborough, Mass.-based ProCurve solution provider. "But my sense is I think the timing would have been a lot worse if this had happened a few years ago."
Cisco partners say the vendor's best defense against HP ProCurve is its end-to-end portfolio and the technology integration it enables. They say that customers choosing HP on the edge now will not be able to implement advanced features such as security and videoconferencing down the line.
"Cisco needs a strong message about the impact of the edge," Mogavero said. "If customers make a decision now based on reduced costs, then two to three years from now when they want to do unified communications or [Cisco] TelePresence, they're not going to be able to do that. NAC is not going to work with HP switches."
Plus, the operational efficiencies gained by Cisco's integration of more features and functionality into products can make it a more cost-effective path over time, Mogavero said.
"Not that HP has a bad product, but if you're doing an enterprise-class or medical-grade network, you want end-to-end [Cisco] IOS, particularly to do voice and video," said Frank Scanga, executive vice president of Axispoint, a Cisco partner in New York.
Scanga said he's confident that Cisco will act to quell the growing ProCurve threat. One necessary step would be to introduce a lower-cost, scaled-back version of its Catalyst 3750 edge switch, something he hopes Cisco is already planning. "Cisco is such a great organization and they do so many things well, but HP has found a way to pique the interest out there. On the edge, they're touting their free support for life. But I think Cisco does realize [the threat]. I've heard rumors that they're going to come out with an edge switch to compete and nip that in the bud," Scanga said.
If that's what Cisco is saying privately to partners, then publically executives are taking a different approach. In recent interviews, several executives said they haven't heard from partners that ProCurve's position in the market is cause for concern, particularly at the enterprise level.
"I'm not sure we have a specific strategy against them. We haven't been woken up to having a specific problem," said Edison Peres, senior vice president of worldwide channels go-to-market at Cisco.
Wendy Bahr, vice president of U.S. and Canada channels at Cisco, said she also has not heard channel partners express concern about HP ProCurve. "ProCurve has got what I consider a lower-end product. We always go back to the value proposition of end-to-end," Bahr said. "Our mission is to keep our eye on the bigger ball: what we can do with end-to-end."
ProCurve's Thompson dismisses Cisco's end-to-end argument. "I'd turn that argument completely around. If you stick with an open-standards-based solution, you have a better chance of making a multivendor unified communications solutions work. You're not locked in," Thompson said. "Having to buy your telephony solution from your networking vendor makes [as much] sense as having to buy your desktop from your networking vendor. We can run Cisco, Microsoft, Avaya, 3Com, Nortel. Pick who you want."
Andrew R. Hickey contributed to this article.
