Email this article   Print article 

Geek Squad Slapped With Restraining Order in Piracy Case

By Laurie Sullivan, CRN
April 13, 2006    3:33 PM ET

Best Buy's aggressively promoted, 24-hour computer support task force Geek Squad has been served with a temporary restraining order barring it from using a popular brand of system restore software, which Best Buy is accused of pirating.

The court order, issued Wednesday by U.S. District Court Judge Sam Sparks in Austin, Texas, stems from a copyright infringement lawsuit filed by Winternals Software LP, makers of ERD Commander 2005, a repair tool that boots a dead computer for system recovery.

The Winternals lawsuit accuses Best Buy – the nation's largest consumer electronics retail chain -- and its subsidiary Geek Squad Inc. of copyright infringement and misuse of trade secrets. Essentially, it alleges that Best Buy has been using unlicensed versions of the software. A hearing has been set for May 12 in Austin.

The federal judge also gave Best Buy 20 days to hand over all Winternals software copies, as well as identify the employees who used the programs, according to the restraining order.

Through a spokesman, Best Buy insisted the company is a proponent of licensed software and takes measures to safeguard against software copyright infringement and software piracy.

"We are aware of the lawsuit filed by Winternals Software and take this action very seriously," Best Buy spokesman Jay Musolf said Thursday. He declined to comment further on the pending litigation.

Winternals and Best Buy began negotiating an agreement last fall to trial the software. The electronics retail chain broke off negotiations in February because it was no longer interested in a commercial license that Winternals' attorney David Weaver at Vinson & Elkins LLP said costs $1,200 each.

In a statement, Winternals said the license being negotiated was valued at more than several million dollars. The lawsuit claims that Geek Squad employees continued to use Winternals’ software in violation of the U.S. Copyright Act.

Intellectual property attorney and partner at Banner & Witcoff Ltd. Ross Dannenberg said large technology companies typically don't allow "this type of infringement to happen." Dannenberg, also an adjunct professor at George Mason University School of Law, said "The infringement must be fairly substantial for Winternals to go through litigation."


Email this article   Print article 

More

Recent Articles

10 Challenges That HP Wants Partners To Tackle Right Now

CRN speaks with HP's business unit chiefs to get a sense of where they'd like partners to focus in the coming year, as well as how CEO Meg Whitman is making a difference.

VAR500: IBM Strikes Deal With Ukraine Bank; HP Bolsters Health-Care Practice

CRN VAR500 solution providers win health-care contracts, work on European banking solution, create a platform for microlending, sharing info on cloud computing and more.

VAR's Guide To Pros And Cons Of Migrating Data To The Cloud

From accessibility to horsepower to latency, VARs have to deal with a lot of issues when moving customers' data to the cloud. Here's one VAR's take on how to handle them.

  More Slide Shows




Related Videos
Loading...