IBM overpowered two competitors in the app—lication integration tools category, earning the highest composite scores on both technical and channel criterion and an overall satisfaction rating of 75.5 in the 2004 CRN Channel Champions Survey. While Microsoft was IBM’s closest competitor in channel areas, BEA Systems was the vendor to beat in technical areas. And it was in technical areas that IBM’s WebSphere Business Integration suite earned its widest margins of victory, besting BEA by 3.1 points on product reliability and 4.1 points on product scalability.

“We wouldn’t be this engaged with IBM if its products weren’t reliable,” said Addie Bourne, vice president of marketing communication at Systar, McLean, Va. “They are the most reliable, and the same goes for scalability, especially with the large customers we have,” she said.

While IBM, Armonk, N.Y., earned high ratings in five of six technical areas, BEA, San Jose, Calif., edged ahead of IBM by four-tenths of a point on the criteria of support for standards and multiple vendors.

On the channel criteria, meanwhile, IBM faced tougher competition from Redmond, Wash.-based Micro]]>">
  Email this article   Print article 

Application Integration Tools: IBM

By Mario Morejon
, CRN

April 23, 2004    4:12 PM ET

IBM overpowered two competitors in the app—lication integration tools category, earning the highest composite scores on both technical and channel criterion and an overall satisfaction rating of 75.5 in the 2004 CRN Channel Champions Survey.

While Microsoft was IBM’s closest competitor in channel areas, BEA Systems was the vendor to beat in technical areas. And it was in technical areas that IBM’s WebSphere Business Integration suite earned its widest margins of victory, besting BEA by 3.1 points on product reliability and 4.1 points on product scalability.

“We wouldn’t be this engaged with IBM if its products weren’t reliable,” said Addie Bourne, vice president of marketing communication at Systar, McLean, Va. “They are the most reliable, and the same goes for scalability, especially with the large customers we have,” she said.

While IBM, Armonk, N.Y., earned high ratings in five of six technical areas, BEA, San Jose, Calif., edged ahead of IBM by four-tenths of a point on the criteria of support for standards and multiple vendors.

On the channel criteria, meanwhile, IBM faced tougher competition from Redmond, Wash.-based Microsoft, which trailed behind the champion by only two-tenths of a point.

While IBM took firsts in the areas of vendor support, return on investment, consistency of programs and responsiveness, Microsoft took top marks in technical education, visibility and upselling opportunities. BEA lead the pack in sales margins.

IBM’s best showing in channel areas was in return on investment for customers, where it finished 2.5 points ahead of Microsoft.

“IBM spent a lot of time analyzing and quantifying the ROI for us and our customers,” said Laurent van Huffel, executive vice president at Systar. “They have a methodology and even tools that model and monitor our ROI in hours.”

IBM’s worst showing was in technical education, where it fell 3.2 points behind Microsoft.

“The one thing we don’t do is force our partners to do certification and training,” said Scott Cosby, program director of WebSphere Business Integration at IBM. “We offer it, we encourage it, we provide it, but we don’t dictate it.

 Published for the Week Of April 26, 2004


Email this article   Print article 

More Channel Programs

Recent Articles

10 Challenges That HP Wants Partners To Tackle Right Now

CRN speaks with HP's business unit chiefs to get a sense of where they'd like partners to focus in the coming year, as well as how CEO Meg Whitman is making a difference.

VAR500: IBM Strikes Deal With Ukraine Bank; HP Bolsters Health-Care Practice

CRN VAR500 solution providers win health-care contracts, work on European banking solution, create a platform for microlending, sharing info on cloud computing and more.

Five Companies That Dropped The Ball This Week

For the week ending Feb. 3, CRN looks at five companies that were either asleep at the wheel or just didn't make good decisions.

  More Slide Shows




Related Videos
Loading...