Q&A With Bill Cate, Sun's New Head of Global Channel Strategy
February 07, 2007 5:29 PM ET
Page 1 of 2
In its bid to develop a consistent worldwide channel program, Sun Microsystems has named longtime partner exec Bill Cate to the newly created position of senior director of global channel strategy. In a recent interview with VARBusiness senior editor Jeffrey Schwartz, Cate discussed Sun's new Sun Partner Advantage program and how the company's approach to the channel is changing.
VB: Now that you have reached the milestone of consolidating the former iForce partner programs, what basically has been accomplished?
Cate: We have launched the basic frameworks of the program--the boring stuff, such as membership requirements, competency requirements and the nuts and bolts of what you need to have a good, solid operational program. To be honest, we are at various stages of completion of that around the world. It is safe to say that we have officially launched the framework for Sun Partner Advantage globally. Now the fun part begins where we actually start to build in advantages for the partners who are at the new Sun Partner Advantage levels.
![]() |
| "We built the Sun Partner Advantage architecture on top of our four business units," says Sun's Bill Cate. |
Cate: We have rolled out three new program levels in North America--an associate level, a principal level and an executive level. The participation criteria are based on a few variables, first of all the infrastructure investment that a partner makes at Sun. Most principal-level partners have invested in competencies to specialize in one of our platform areas, such as systems, storage, software or advanced services. If you move up to the executive level, you find partners at a smaller level that have made investments in all of Sun at all levels to some extent. In North America, we have classified partners into these program levels, and we have a system in place to compensate them for meeting directional types of targets, like where they are selling. In other words, a partner can earn more at the principal and executive levels for selling into certain markets, new customers, spaces where we have less coverage. Where they sell is recognized. We define that very clearly with our channel partners where we are willing to compensate more.
I want to be clear: All partners participate with Sun in all of our accounts. If we have a very large Sun account in the Americas that may be classified as one of our top 100 accounts, we definitely want partners there, but it will be truly based on their value add to that account. Where we are compensating more heavily is in our portfolio and territory accounts, where we have less or no Sun coverage. We have sales teams that will go there with the partner, but much fewer resources. In those cases, the up-front transaction margin is typically better, and the back-end rebates paid are much higher as well.
VB: How much higher?
Cate: It really depends on the program or initiative. For instance, a storage program has probably two times more back-end rebate rewards than selling the same storage product into a large existing Sun account. In some cases, if it's a brand-new customer that the partner brings to Sun, the rebate [can be] 10 times. It's all around the philosophy that we don't expect partners to go into markets without us. It's our job to stimulate demand, but as they invest resources and help us grow in those accounts, we want to pay them more. That's the philosophy of the SPA in the Americas.
VB: What about the front-end margins in the different types of accounts?
Cate: Front-end margin [and market development funds] is the same everywhere, but when you get into reality and you go into a large account and large end user discounts are already negotiated and competition is heavy, by most accounts the transaction margin becomes squeezed. Partners who engage with us through the teaming process have to be recognized with some margin protection. That's where the value portion comes in. When resellers and global systems integrators are participating with Sun, or if we are participating with them, we are doing it because they bring something to the table that we don't do very well. So transaction-wise, we will try to protect the basic transaction margin through teaming and registration processes, and in some cases we will try to compensate more in the transaction margin, depending on the types of value. We are trying to be more specific about what types of value we are willing to pay more for. It's a very difficult discussion to have. We are trying to work on some clear guidelines for our partners and our sales organization on the kinds of value we are willing to pay more for. Starting in our fiscal year 2008, which is in July, you will see a little more discipline in the kinds of guidelines our sales organizations would use when trying to determine what value really is.
NEXT: Specifics on guidelines already in place.
|
|
Five Companies That Dropped The Ball This Week For the week ending Feb. 10, CRN looks at five companies that were either asleep at the wheel or just didn't make good decisions. |
|
|
Five Companies That Came To Win This Week For the week ending Feb. 10, CRN looks at five companies that brought their 'A' game and made moves to beat out competitors |
|
|
10 Challenges That HP Wants Partners To Tackle Right Now CRN speaks with HP's business unit chiefs to get a sense of where they'd like partners to focus in the coming year, as well as how CEO Meg Whitman is making a difference. |
- Sun To Use Intel Chips In Servers
- Sun Taps Cate To Broaden Channel Program Globally
- Cognizant Sales Soar, Exec Promotions Follow
- VAR500 Company EPAM Systems: IPO Update
- Oracle VARs Worry New Channel Incentives Mean Delays, Lower Prices
- Oracle Unveils Storage Strategy In Wake Of Pillar Data Acquisition

