Google said that it is not subject to the same Federal Communications Commission regulations as major telecoms, after telecom giant A&T said the search engine company's VoIP service, Google Voice, violates federal communications laws.
Google's assertion comes after AT&T demanded that the Federal Communications Commission investigate Google's Google Voice service, which it says should be subject to the same federal communications laws as common telecom carriers. Specifically, AT&T said Google Voice service restricts users from placing calls to geographic locations that charge significantly higher access fees -- fees that major telecoms are required to pay.
Telecom providers, such as AT&T, are not permitted to discriminately charge more based on location, according to the FCC.
Google maintained in a blog that common carriers, like AT&T, have been justified in accusing local carriers of abusing the system. Common carriers have frequently accused local carriers of charging excessive connection fees under a plethora of misrepresented pretences, as well as engaging in corrupt practices such as taking kickbacks from pornographic chatline operators and other services.
"We agree with AT&T that the current carrier compensation system is badly flawed, and that the single best answer is for the FCC to take the necessary steps to fix it," Richard Whit, Google media counsel, acknowledged in a company blog.
Under common carrier laws, local telephone carriers have the discretion to charge common carriers such as AT&T exorbitantly high rates to connect calls to their networks. Meanwhile, these common carriers are required to connect these calls, regardless of how much they're charged per location.
"By blocking these calls, Google is able to reduce its access expenses," AT&T said in a letter, the Los Angeles Times reports.
However, Whit also stipulated that Google Voice is unlike other mainstream carriers, and therefore not subject to the same FCC regulations that apply to AT&T and other major telecoms. For one, its services are free or low cost and not subject to common carrier laws. Meanwhile, Google Voice doesn't restrict certain outbound calls from its Web platforms to more expensive locations, and the service is invitation only, Whit said, which ultimately serves a limited number of users, and affords the company the discretion of restricting access in certain geographies.
In addition, Whit maintained, Google Voice was never intended to replace traditional telecom carriers. "In fact, you need an existing land or wireless line in order to use it," Whit said. "Importantly, users are still able to make outbound calls on any other phone device."
This skirmish is the latest in the ongoing battle between Google, major telecoms and the FCC. The telecom giant has also accused Google Voice of violating recent FCC "net neutrality" guidelines, which among other things, establishes fair competition between network and Internet Service Providers.
"AT&T is trying to make this about Google's support for an open Internet, but the comparison just doesn't fly. The FCC's open Internet principles apply only to the behavior of broadband carriers -- not the creators of Web-based software applications," Whit said.