Email this article   Print article 


Review: Under The Hood Of 5 MSP Platforms

By Mario Morejon
January 15, 2007    12:00 AM ET

Page 1 of 6

The MSP craze of 2006 was spearheaded by midmarket solution providers catering to SMBs with mostly Windows-based networks.

This is why CRN Test Center engineers were surprised to discover that in a Windows-dominated world, a popular sampling of MSP platform products revealed a lack of integration with certain critical Windows technologies.

Test Center engineers popped the hood on an expensive MSP platform from SilverBack Technologies, medium-priced products from vendors LPI Level Platforms and N-Able Technologies, and a low-cost product from vendor AdventNet.

 1. SilverBack Technologies
 2. LPI Level Platforms

 3. N-Able Technologies

 4. AdventNet

 5. Nagios
 
We searched for integration with key Microsoft monitoring technologies that capture performance, execute security auditing and provide automatic links to Windows' auto-update system. But engineers discovered that these various MSP platforms were not fully integrated with certain vital Windows technologies. What's more, as new technology looms—such as Vista's programmatic event tracers and Intel's VPro auto-discovery—MSP vendors are still in the planning stages when it comes to preparing their products.

Because it is a Windows-dominated world, the Test Center invited Microsoft's System Center Essentials platform to participate. Many MSPs said Microsoft might own the MSP platform market with System Center Essentials, but the software giant declined to take part.

Because a successful MSP business is a proactive one, the Test Center determined that a well-structured resource workflow is a prerequisite to a quality MSP platform. Many MSP vendors, however, have architected their products to be reactive, and these types of products, which lack high-level workflow support sequences, can easily overwhelm small service providers with limited resources.

Equally important to success is quick access to support. Tracing faults should be direct and simple. When an alert has been identified, service providers should be able to know how to solve it right on the screen.

Linking a knowledge base to alert types is also a must-have feature. Moreover, service providers should be able to click on alert links that send them directly to a device interface at a customer site. Most MSP vendors in the review lacked this feature. But most demonstrated key strengths such as automated report generation.

The following pages reveal the details on each platform.

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | Next >>

To continue reading this article, please download the free CRN Tech News app for your iPad or Windows 8 device.
Related: Videos | Slide Shows | Comments

SHARE THIS ARTICLE

More Managed Services

Recent Articles

MSPs: Where The Money Is

In a recent Autotask survey, partners outline their key care-abouts in the delivery of effective and profitable service offerings. And, as cloud and managed services gain momentum, these aspects become especially critical.

10 Tips Along The Path To A Managed Services Model

VARs take different roads to the managed service model. Find out some best practices that can help in your migration.

9 Questions Hosting Providers Better Be Prepared To Answer

It's not all about the cost savings. Datagram lays out the top concerns potential customers have when they're on the hunt for a hosting provider.

  More Slide Shows




Related Videos
Loading...