It's a security suite called Internet Security 2006. Offered by Finnish company F-Secure, this suite offers not only all the functionality of products from the Big Three, but also rootkit detection—and for $10 less than the Big Three Charge.
Like the Big Three, F-Secure offers anti-virus and anti-spyware capabilities, a firewall, mail screening, and content filtering. But F-Secure's rootkit detection is the most significant feature. According to our best guesstimate, this will be the only security suite on the market to offer rootkit detection for at least the next six months, possibly even for the next year.
For those living under a rock, rootkit detection is tremendously important these days, because this new breed of highly undetectable (or "stealth") malware is prevalent in the wild. A rootkit plays havoc with any system on which it takes up residence. (For more information on rootkit detection, see our recent TechBuilder Recipe, Rooting Out Rootkits.)
F-Secure's Internet Security 2006 retails for $59, roughly $10 cheaper than comparable security suites from other top players in the market. (Norton Internet Security, for example, lists for $69.) While $10 may not sound like a big deal, if you're installing a security suite onto dozens of machines—perhaps even hundreds—then your savings on a volume license will add up significantly.
The Many Benefits of F-Secure Internet Security 2006
Let's start off by taking a look at how F-Secure Internet Security stacks up against Norton Internet Security and Trend Micro Internet Security. For starters, here's what all three suites offer:
Where F-Secure's Internet Security 2006 goes beyond the suite offerings from the major players in functionality is in rootkit detection. Using the company's rootkit-detection engine, called Blacklight, the software detects and even eliminates active rootkits on a computer. The tool also does a great job of cutting extraneous chatter out of its results, so system builders will no longer be confused by the kinds of false positives that most other tools routinely report.
Pros (and a Few Cons) of Using F-Secure Internet Security 2006
Security suites—like other kinds of "do-it-all" software packages—do their best to tackle everything users expect and want them to do. But they do some things better than others. F-Secure's suite is no exception.
On the plus side, F-Secure Internet Security 2006 gets top marks for its anti-virus software (and fast signature update), firewall, and rootkit detector. Its content-filtering capabilities are adequate for most SOHO situations.
But its anti-spyware and anti-spam capabilities lag behind those of the Big Three's products. This doesn't mean F-Secure isn't a terrific product at a great value. Nor does it mean you'll be exposing your customers to unnecessary risks. And this deficit is easy to address: Simply install the freeware version of Microsoft's Windows Defender, which consistently does well in ratings and rankings for this kind of software.
Further, recent comparison reviews note that F-Secure Internet Security 2006 does a fine job of protecting clean machines from new spyware, they give the product lower marks for its ability to clean up existing infestations and detecting the presence of certain insidious types of spyware, most notably keyloggers. (Keyloggers store all the keystrokes that users make in a file, then periodically ship it off to a presumably malicious third party for harvesting of account and password info, credit-card data, and other sensitive information.) But we won't jump down F-Secure's throat on this function: No suite-based spyware detection software currently matches best-of-breed standalone implementations when dealing with keyloggers.
Omnibus security packages also tend to have sizable system footprints; the smallest of the suites we know is BitDefender. This security suite comes in at a relatively svelte 50 MB. Most other suites consume up to 70 MB at runtime, and even more when actively scanning for malware. In the case of F-Secure Internet Security 2006, a complete install on our test system consumed an average of 92 MB while actively scanning for spyware and viruses, and about 56 MB otherwise. As such packages go, this makes it bit less resource-consumptive than most.