Homepage Rankings and Research Companies Channelcast Marketing Matters CRNtv Events WOTC Jobs Cisco Partner Summit Digital 2020 Lenovo Tech World Newsroom Dell Technologies World Digital Experience 2020 HPE Zone Masergy Zenith Partner Program Newsroom Intel Partner Connect Digital Newsroom Dell Technologies Newsroom Fortinet Secure Network Hub IBM Newsroom Juniper Newsroom The IoT Integrator Lenovo Channel-First NetApp Data Fabric Intel Tech Provider Zone

Verizon And The iPhone? No Way, Says Analyst

The problem is that both Verizon and Apple have 'customer control' goals -- Apple with its App Store and Verizon with its V Cast services -- which will keep them from reaching an agreement.

The problem, argues Kaufman Bros. analyst Shaw Wu, is that both Verizon and Apple have "customer control" goals and it's those goals -- Apple with its App Store and Verizon with its V Cast services, for example -- that will keep them from reaching an agreement.

"Apple controls the media experience with iTunes and VZ [Verizon] with its V Cast service," wrote Wu in a research note Wednesday. "Moreover, Apple gets very favorable economics with an overall iPhone [average selling price] of $611 and at AT&T, we estimate it is higher at roughly $700. RIM, who is by far VZ's largest smartphone supplier, only has an ASP of $340, Palm's ASP is $436 and we estimate Motorola's Droid ASP is roughly $450."

Apple's exclusive carrier agreement with AT&T for the iPhone is widely expected to end in 2010, and the iPhone has already been opened up to other carriers abroad in what were once exclusive markets. A recent study from Consumer Reports found that many AT&T subscribers were frustrated with aspects of AT&T's iPhone service.

Verizon originally was pegged as the most likely choice for Apple to expand iPhone coverage in the U.S., but a recent war of words and images between Verizon, AT&T, the Motorola Droid and the iPhone has done much to dilute Verizon iPhone excitement.

In recent days, T-Mobile has emerged as a much-buzzed-about alternative for iPhone carriers. Thomas Weisel analyst Doug Reid told The Street on Monday that T-Mobile makes the most sense for Apple because the GSM version of the iPhone that Apple manufactures for AT&T's network would also work for T-Mobile's.

In the Kaufman Bros. note, Wu concurs, adding that both T-Mobile and Sprint would be more compatible with Apple's goals than Verizon. Wu also notes that "from a technology perspective, we believe T-Mobile may have an advantage with a similar 3G UMTS/WCDMA network as AT&T." Wu further advised that AT&T could extend its contract with Apple, and that a last-minute extension when the contract runs out -- most analysts believe that will happen sometime in the summer of 2010 -- wouldn't be a surprise.

Back to Top



trending stories

sponsored resources