To be fair, suites like Google Docs offer quick and easy word processing and some spreadsheet functionality that gives the Redmond, Wash.-based software giant a run for its money. With that in mind, the CRN Test Center wanted to provide a close look at Access 2007, the $229 Microsoft desktop database that received a major upgrade in this recent version over Access 2003 and which comes included in Office 2007. To be a true Office Killer, other suites will have to find a way to take on Access 2007.
First, reviewers looked at the competitors: Kexi is an open-source desktop database that is free to download and is cross-platform—that is, it runs in Windows XP or Vista, Mac OS X and Linux. It's available for download at www.kexi-project.org, and bills itself as "Microsoft Access for Linux." The Test Center looked at it: It's not. It wouldn't install on a system with a 64-bit version of Windows Vista Ultimate, and can only install on Ubuntu or other Gnome versions of desktop Linux by employing sudo administration because it is written to the K Development Environment (KDE). Reviewers did get Kexi installed and running on a 32-bit version of Windows Vista and it did offer a friendly user interface with the ability to create tables, queries, forms and reports. Kexi allows for the creation of blank databases, importation of existing databases or the creation of an address book database from a template. Other templates—for customer records, inventory and the like—were not evident. Want to create a macro for Kexi? You can, but you'll need to deploy a script that enables a program written in the Python object-oriented programming language. It's got a built-in SQLite database engine and is capable of connecting to MySQL and PostgreSQL. Overall, it's a rudimentary, lightweight desktop database, meaning you get what you pay for.
In fact, with Base, it takes about twice the number of clicks to create a table and run a report as it does in Microsoft Access 2007—a noteworthy efficiency gap. That could give Microsoft an edge when it comes to ROI that many enterprises and workgroups are now making a priority. It's not that Base is bad software and it's not that it isn't well-organized. But it simply fails in areas where Microsoft excels, and those are areas where solution providers can make a compelling case for cost savings. Consider this: If it takes a $20-an-hour office worker 15 fewer minutes a day to tabulate data and run a report in Access 2007 than it does in Base, that efficiency means that the cost-of-acquisition of Microsoft Office easily pays for itself in just a matter of months over the cost-free software suite. And that's just with one application.
Mileage, as the saying goes, may vary. Each enterprise is like a fingerprint—no two are exactly alike. But on the whole, count on Access to offer significant efficiency in both customization and workflow, not to mention cost of deployment across a Microsoft-ready enterprise.
So where does Access 2007 soar? Its features are defined and marked clearly in the workspace, navigating between features is easy and wizards are available in every feature. It's possible to create a macro in about a minute using a macro wizard. In Access 2007, table fields can store attachments (think about PDF versions of expense receipts, for example) and for the solution provider, it's easy to deploy. Microsoft provides marketing, technical and financial support to solution providers, while OpenOffice.org or Kexi's KDE development community don't even come close to that level of support.
For example, Kexi's online documentation is expansive but much of it is clearly written by those whose primary language isn't English. For solution providers based in the U.S., that could be an issue.
While Access 2007 and the rest of Office won't work in Linux, if an enterprise has already opted to standardize on Linux for the client, it's most likely for reasons that have little to do with office (small "o") productivity, or a desktop database simply isn't a thought.
For now, Office Killers won't find Microsoft's Achilles' heel by looking at Access. At press time for CRNtech, the K Desktop Environment was set to launch KDE 4.0, of which Kexi is a part. But while the community continues to work to upgrade and improve it as part of an overall desktop productivity solution which is free (or "libre"), it continues to trail Access by a significant distance in performance and functionality.
related stories
Video
trending stories
sponsored resources

Veeam
Veeam

Cato Networks
SASE & SD-WAN 360

Channel Chief Showcase

CRN Showcase

APC by Schneider Electric
Digital Services for Edge Learning Center

Acer
Remote Workforce 360

Cradlepoint
5g for Business 360

Trend Micro
Trend Micro Learning Center

Partner Program Guide Showcase

Sophos
Sophos Cybersecurity Learning Center

Cyber Protection 360

Comm100
Collaboration & Communications 360

VMware

HubStor
Cloud Backup 360

Wasabi
Wasabi

Cysurance
Cyber Insurance 360

Dell Technologies
Microsoft HCI Solutions from Dell Technologies Learning Center

Dell Technologies
Dell Technologies Server Learning Center

Dell Technologies
Dell Technologies Cloud Learning Center

Sherweb
Sherweb

Carbonite
Cloud Storage 360

Comcast Business
Comcast Business Learning Center

Terranova Security
Cybersecurity 360

CyberPower
CyberPower

eSentire
Managed Detection and Response 360

EPOS
EPOS

NPD
Industry Trends 360

Vertiv
Edge Computing Learning Center

Webroot
Webroot Learning Center

Tenable
Cyber Risk 360

BlackBerry
BlackBerry Learning Center

Fujifilm
Fujifilm

Vonage
Vonage

Application Integration 360

Hitachi Vantara
Hitachi Vantara

Smart 3rd Party
3rd Party Maintenance 360

SentinelONE
EndPoint Security 360

iboss
Cloud SASE Platform 360

Dell Technologies
Dell Technologies Storage Learning Center

Fortinet
Fortinet

Area 1 Security
Area 1 Security
